American wars on Venezuela and Iran are Crimes Against Peace violating the UN Convention ; worse Crime than Genocide

American wars on Venezuela and Iran are Crimes Against Peace violating the UN Convention .<<

This is the Crime Nazi Herman Goering was charged with at Nurembourg
http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2026/02/american-wars-on-venezuela-and-iran-are.html<


<


ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AGREES WITH ME
https://www.google.com/search?q=American+wars+on+Venezuela+and+Iran+are+Crimes+Against+Peace+violating+the+UN+Convention+.%3C&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari#cobssid=s&lfId=ChxjMe<


AI says "Based on reports regarding U.S. actions in early 2026, numerous international law experts, UN officials, and various nations have condemned U.S. military operations against Venezuela and its policy toward Iran as violations of international law, specifically the UN Charter. These actions-including the Jan. 3, 2026, military operation in Venezuela that removed President Nicolás Maduro-have been characterized by critics as acts of aggression and "crimes against peace," undermining the rules-based international order. *


Amnesty Internatio... +4 Key Points Regarding U.S. Actions (2025-Key Points Regarding U.S. Actions (2025- 2026):


• Venezuela Intervention: On January 3, 2026, the U.S. conducted a military operation, described by officials as a "counter-narco-terrorism" move, which resulted in the removal of President Maduro. UN experts, the NonAligned Movement, and various nations condemned this as an unlawful use of force violating Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which prohibits the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. • "Crimes Against Peace" Argument: Legal experts and observers have argued that the U.S. actions, including the forced removal of a head of state and the previous naval blockades in late 2025, constitute acts of aggression under international law. These actions are, in some analyses, likened to actions against Iran-including a June 2025 military strike-have been described as unlawful. The U.S. has maintained a "maximum pressure" campaign involving economic sanctions, which UN experts have previously criticized for violating human rights and the norms of international behavior.


• Violation of Sovereignty: Critics assert that the U.S. actions are not justified by self-defense or Security Council authorization, making them a "textbook example of an 'act of aggression''


• U.S. Position: The U.S. administration has argued that its actions are lawful, framing them as self-defense, counter- narcoterrorism, and a commitment to preventing safe havens for hostile actors. @ ohchr +10 The international community is currently in an "uneasy balance," with some nations calling for accountability while others avoid conflict withmaking them a "textbook example of an 'act of aggression'''

• U.S. Position: The U.S. administration has argued that its actions are lawful, framing them as self-defense, counter- narcoterrorism, and a commitment to preventing safe havens for hostile actors. @ ohchr +10


The international community is currently in an "uneasy balance," with some nations calling for accountability while others avoid conflict with the U.S.. • YouTube UN experts condemn US aggression against... Jan 7, 2026 — GENEVA - United Nations experts* today strongly... ohchr U.S. Allies and Reactions to O Feb 18, 2026 - The Bureau of the Non-A 舢 Just Security