So-called trans continue to expose themselves as sociopathic male supremacists

So-called trans continue to expose themselves as sociopathic male supremacists So-called trans continue to expose themselves as sociopathic male supremacists https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-guardian-goes-for-jk-rowling Charles Brown : As with their bigotted , male supremacist term "trans exclusionary radical feminists " to describe feminists who utterly obliterate men's claims to be women, so-called trans described in the article below make the male chauvinist claim that refusal to accept "trans"-claims to be women are worse than wife -beating !!! How foul "trans" are . Why , rejecting trans ideology is politically and morally correct; not wrong . They are so-called trans because it is impossible for someone to transfer from one sex/gender ( sex and gender are synonyms ) to the other . It's shocking how much of the "Left", how many so-called progressives , are not outraged by the blatant male supremacy of males using the terms "trans exclusionary radical feminists" as a pejorative reference to WOMEN demanding that "trans" males are not women ! Get a clue about sex and gender, Lefties. "trans"males pressuring lesbians to have sex with them as if the trans were females is RAPE-pressure . Article says : "It seems that taking gratuitous swipes at J.K. Rowling has become something of a competition for liberal broadsheets on both sides of the pond. First, the New York Times took a potshot at the Harry Potter creator for its new marketing campaign trumpeting 'independent journalism.' And now the Guardian – keen to prove that, it too, is achingly right on – has published a piece which implies that Rowling's views on same-sex spaces are somehow more controversial than domestic abuse. Grim. CB: New York Times should be denounced for vile and insane male supremacy "The latest jibe at Britain's greatest living writer came in a piece detailing the controversies around the production of the Fantastic Beasts film. Film critic Ryan Gilbey noted that 'one of its stars, Johnny Depp' left after losing a libel case which referred to him as a 'wife-beater' following accusations of domestic violence made against him by his ex-wife Amber Heard. Another star, Ezra Miller, was videoed grabbing a woman by the throat in a bar in Reykjavik and was last week arrested for disorderly conduct in a Hawaii karaoke bar." "For Gilbey and the Guardian though, alleged wife-beating and choking women in public were 'small beer' compared to Rowling writing about own personal experiences and views on the transgender debate. Having listed the accusations facing Depp and Miller, Gilbey claimed that: “ This all feels like small beer compared with the controversy that has swirled around Rowling over the past few years, ever since a long essay she wrote about her gender-critical feminism put her at the centre of the row about trans rights. The world of Harry and its Fantastic Beasts spin-offs has undoubtedly been marred by this. Are words really more harmful than actions? Quite a statement from such a leading organ of PC opinion. Following an online backlash, the Guardian has now been forced to change its article, noting in a footnote that: 'this article was amended on 8 April 2022 to rephrase a sentence that inadvertently downplayed the actions of Depp and Miller.' Yet as writer Sarah Ditum points out, the piece also celebrates fans 'removing her from the picture' and 'taking ownership' of Rowling's work – just like the NYT's campaign to 'imagine Harry Potter without its creator.' CB: Oh biggotted New York Times Erasing women – how progressive. http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2022/03/suchetas-womanifesto.html http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2022/03/the-objective-reality-of-sex-is.html https://www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k-rowling-writes-about-her-reasons-for-speaking-out-on-sex-and-gender-issues/ http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2022/03/marxist-critique-of-trans-ideology.html The theory of eliminating binary gender is reactionary, Lorant Szabo. It is based on the reactionary philosophy of Foucault and Butler. What must be eliminated is male supremacy ( as Lenin refers to in your meme), not binary gender. Transgender male to female is male supremacist . This is made patent in the case of Bruce Jenner. They are subjective idealist , not Leninist, not adherents to the principles Lenin argues in _Materialism and Emipirio-criticism_. Foucault and Butler are neo-Kantians; Foucault thinks biology and sex are unknowable , that there are no valid biological laws and facts. That's Kantian agnosticism , not dialectical materialism . Biological sex with respect to the gametes is only part of the equation; there are brain structures that are unique to male and female brains and these have a genetic basis; when the entire genetic make up a person is taken into consideration sexuality becomes a more complicated problem. A predominately female brain can develop in a physically male body and vice versa and this is the level on which transexuallty takes place. CB: no gametes are the ultimate determining characteristic of what biological sex an individual is . The other characteristics are semi-auxiliary. Biological sex is completely determined by the role one plays in reproduction . Only gametes - the ovum/sperm binary - strictly define sex. All genetic variations of X , Y combination go to one of the two , binary, fertile gamete types; or to an infertile type which cannot be a sex, because only fertile types constitute sexes. Intersex people do not constitute a third sex. Sex is ultimately determined by whether one has ovums or sperm. As you cite, 1,999 out of 2000 times genitalia correspond to gamete cells. But , sex in biology refers to the complementary opposite , division of labor in fertile sexual union , necessary for perpetuation of a sexually reproducing species, which Homo sapiens is. No third type of reproductive cell (gamete) is necessary or able to participate in fertile unions of cells. Someone asked : "Aren't there humans born with different sex chromosomes that can't be categorized in a binary system? http://www.isna.org/faq/what_is_intersex" https://breadandrosesradio.wordpress.com/2016/08/26/female-erasure-gender-politics-war-on-women-the-female-sex-and-human-rights/ Radical Feminist author and Elder Pagan Priestess, Ruth Barrett has edited an anthology titled Female Erasure…Gender Politics’ War on Women, the Female Sex and Human Rights which argues that gender theory and the transgender movement is an extension of patriarchy’s historical dominance and oppression of women. Host Elliot Tarry interviews Ruth Barrett and anthology contributor Falcon River. DOWNLOAD: FEMALE ERASURE INTERVIEW Rightwing publications are more feminist than the Left on the "trans" issue. oh politics makes strange bedfellows. It’s Time to Stop Denying Reality About Transgender Athletes Dec 21st, 2021 3 min read COMMENTARY Jared Eckert KEY TAKEAWAYS Hormone levels alone don’t make someone a woman. And no amount of cross-sex hormones can undo the biological benefits of male genetics and development. Polling shows that 67% of Americans oppose allowing biological males who identify as transgender to compete in girls and women’s athletics. As we prepare to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Title IX next year, elected officials should stand up for women, for reality, and for the American public. It’s Time to Stop Denying Reality About Transgender Athletes Dec 21st, 2021 3 min read COMMENTARY Jared Eckert Hormone levels alone don’t make someone a woman. And no amount of cross-sex hormones can undo the biological benefits of male genetics and development. Polling shows that 67% of Americans oppose allowing biological males who identify as transgender to compete in girls and women’s athletics. As we prepare to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Title IX next year, elected officials should stand up for women, for reality, and for the American public. It’s Time to Stop Denying Reality About Transgender Athletes Dec 21st, 2021 3 min read COMMENTARY Jared Eckert KEY TAKEAWAYS Hormone levels alone don’t make someone a woman. And no amount of cross-sex hormones can undo the biological benefits of male genetics and development. Polling shows that 67% of Americans oppose allowing biological males who identify as transgender to compete in girls and women’s athletics. As we prepare to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Title IX next year, elected officials should stand up for women, for reality, and for the American public. Copied A transgender athlete, Lia Thomas, dominated during a Nov. 20 women’s swim meet with athletes representing Cornell, Princeton, and the University of Pennsylvania. Thomas, a biological male who identifies as a woman, set new Ivy League records for the women’s 500 and 200 freestyle and smashed numerous UPenn records in women’s swimming. In the 1650 freestyle final, Thomas, who used to swim on UPenn’s men’s team as Will Thomas, blew the competition out of the water—finishing first with a devastating, 38-second lead. Get exclusive insider information from Heritage experts delivered straight to your inbox each week. Subscribe to The Agenda >> Sadly, stories such as this one have become more common. If the Biden-Harris administration has its way, they could become the rule. Just a few weeks after Thomas trounced biologically female teammates, President Joe Biden’s Department of Education announced plans to amend Title IX regulations to conform to the president’s executive order on what it calls “Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation.” Such amendments by the Education Department would allow biological males to compete against women in the name of “equality” and “preventing discrimination.” But the truth is, these amendments would contradict reality, equality, and popular opinion. Hormone levels alone don’t make someone a woman. And no amount of cross-sex hormones can undo the biological benefits of male genetics and development. A 2020 study by the BMJ, formerly the British Journal of Medicine, shows that male athletes who are “transitioning” retain a competitive edge against women even after two years of taking estrogen. In earlier days, one wouldn’t have needed a scientific study to prove the point. Thomas’ 38-second lead in the freestyle speaks for itself. And yet, gender ideologues continue to deny reality. Despite the science, the NCAA—and the International Olympics Committee—requires that a biological male’s testosterone must be suppressed for only one year before that male is free to compete against women. Like the NCAA, the Biden administration’s latest announcement denies the science of biological sex. However, denying the truth has consequences. Specifically, the denial of sexual reality robs women of the very opportunities protected by the federal law known as Title IX. Under Title IX, women’s athletics received equal resources for facilities, training, recruitment, and scholarships. As a result, far more womenparticipated in sports. In 1972, the number of female athletes in high school totaled 295,000. Now there are 2.6 million. The number of female college athletes has quintupled in that same time. Title IX also is credited with decreasing dropout rates for women and increasing the number of women in higher education. Allowing trans-identifying biological males to compete in women’s sports, or for women’s scholarships, reverses this progress. Thomas’ drubbing of female swimmers in the Ivy League is just the latest example. The female athlete who would have placed first ended up placing second—to Thomas, a biological male with a proven biological advantage. What’s more, Thomas’ personal bests in the 500 and 1650 freestyle would break current NCAA records in women’s swimming set by an Olympic gold medalist, Katie Ledecky. Imagine if Thomas had competed against Ledecky and performed at a personal-best level. The world might never have come to know of Ledecky. Now imagine how many women athletes would miss out on scholarship and career opportunities if forced to compete against biological males in every contest. This is the world the White House seeks to usher in. Being out of step with reality is bad enough. But the Biden administration is out of step with Americans, too. Polling shows that 67% of Americans oppose allowing biological males who identify as transgender to compete in girls and women’s athletics. Twenty states are suing the Department of Education over the new regulations. Over 37 states have introduced bills to keep women’s sports for women. Nine have passed such bills. The Biden administration and its gender-activist allies made their unpopular view clear from Day One. The administration won’t be content to stop at changing Title IX regulations. It will go on to rewrite the law to force female athletes across the nation to compete against biological males. Barring that, the White House will seek to change the law piece by piece. It will be the death of women’s sports by a thousand cuts. Enough is enough. As we prepare to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Title IX next year, elected officials should stand up for women, for reality, and for the American public. This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal A transgender athlete, Lia Thomas, dominated during a Nov. 20 women’s swim meet with athletes representing Cornell, Princeton, and the University of Pennsylvania. Thomas, a biological male who identifies as a woman, set new Ivy League records for the women’s 500 and 200 freestyle and smashed numerous UPenn records in women’s swimming. In the 1650 freestyle final, Thomas, who used to swim on UPenn’s men’s team as Will Thomas, blew the competition out of the water—finishing first with a devastating, 38-second lead. Sadly, stories such as this one have become more common Just a few weeks after Thomas trounced biologically female teammates, President Joe Biden’s Department of Education announced plans to amend Title IX regulations to conform to the president’s executive order on what it calls “Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation.” Such amendments by the Education Department would allow biological males to compete against women in the name of “equality” and “preventing discrimination.” But the truth is, these amendments would contradict reality, equality, and popular opinion. Hormone levels alone don’t make someone a woman. And no amount of cross-sex hormones can undo the biological benefits of male genetics and development. A 2020 study by the BMJ, formerly the British Journal of Medicine, shows that male athletes who are “transitioning” retain a competitive edge against women even after two years of taking estrogen. In earlier days, one wouldn’t have needed a scientific study to prove the point. Thomas’ 38-second lead in the freestyle speaks for itself. And yet, transgender ideologues continue to deny reality. Despite the science, the NCAA—and the International Olympics Committee—requires that a biological male’s testosterone must be suppressed for only one year before that male is free to compete against women. Like the NCAA, the Biden administration’s latest announcement denies the science of biological sex. However, denying the truth has consequences. Specifically, the denial of sexual reality robs women of the very opportunities protected by the federal law known as Title IX. Under Title IX, women’s athletics received equal resources for facilities, training, recruitment, and scholarships. As a result, far more womenparticipated in sports. In 1972, the number of female athletes in high school totaled 295,000. Now there are 2.6 million. The number of female college athletes has quintupled in that same time. Title IX also is credited with decreasing dropout rates for women and increasing the number of women in higher education. Allowing trans-identifying biological males to compete in women’s sports, or for women’s scholarships, reverses this progress. Thomas’ drubbing of female swimmers in the Ivy League is just the latest example. The female athlete who would have placed first ended up placing second—to Thomas, a biological male with a proven biological advantage. What’s more, Thomas’ personal bests in the 500 and 1650 freestyle would break current NCAA records in women’s swimming set by an Olympic gold medalist, Katie Ledecky. Imagine if Thomas had competed against Ledecky and performed at a personal-best level. The world might never have come to know of Ledecky. Now imagine how many women athletes would miss out on scholarship and career opportunities if forced to compete against biological males in every contest. This is the world the White House seeks to usher in. Being out of step with reality is bad enough. But the Biden administration is out of step with Americans, too. Polling shows that 67% of Americans oppose allowing biological males who identify as transgender to compete in girls and women’s athletics. Twenty states are suing the Department of Education over the new regulations. Over 37 states have introduced bills to keep women’s sports for women. Nine have passed such bills. The Biden administration and its gender-activist allies made their unpopular view clear from Day One. The administration won’t be content to stop at changing Title IX regulations. It will go on to rewrite the law to force female athletes across the nation to compete against biological males. Barring that, the White House will seek to change the law piece by piece. It will be the death of women’s sports by a thousand cuts. Enough is enough. As we prepare to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Title IX next year, elected officials should stand up for women, for reality, and for the American public. ' This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal Sent from my iPhone A transgender athlete, Lia Thomas, dominated during a Nov. 20 women’s swim meet with athletes representing Cornell, Princeton, and the University of Pennsylvania. Thomas, a biological male who identifies as a woman, set new Ivy League records for the women’s 500 and 200 freestyle and smashed numerous UPenn records in women’s swimming. In the 1650 freestyle final, Thomas, who used to swim on UPenn’s men’s team as Will Thomas, blew the competition out of the water—finishing first with a devastating, 38-second lead. Get exclusive insider information from Heritage experts delivered straight to your inbox each week. Subscribe to The Agenda >> Sadly, stories such as this one have become more common. If the Biden-Harris administration has its way, they could become the rule. Just a few weeks after Thomas trounced biologically female teammates, President Joe Biden’s Department of Education announced plans to amend Title IX regulations to conform to the president’s executive order on what it calls “Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation.” Such amendments by the Education Department would allow biological males to compete against women in the name of “equality” and “preventing discrimination.” But the truth is, these amendments would contradict reality, equality, and popular opinion. Hormone levels alone don’t make someone a woman. And no amount of cross-sex hormones can undo the biological benefits of male genetics and development. A 2020 study by the BMJ, formerly the British Journal of Medicine, shows that male athletes who are “transitioning” retain a competitive edge against women even after two years of taking estrogen. In earlier days, one wouldn’t have needed a scientific study to prove the point. Thomas’ 38-second lead in the freestyle speaks for itself. And yet, gender ideologues continue to deny reality. Despite the science, the NCAA—and the International Olympics Committee—requires that a biological male’s testosterone must be suppressed for only one year before that male is free to compete against women. Like the NCAA, the Biden administration’s latest announcement denies the science of biological sex. However, denying the truth has consequences. Specifically, the denial of sexual reality robs women of the very opportunities protected by the federal law known as Title IX. Under Title IX, women’s athletics received equal resources for facilities, training, recruitment, and scholarships. As a result, far more womenparticipated in sports. In 1972, the number of female athletes in high school totaled 295,000. Now there are 2.6 million. The number of female college athletes has quintupled in that same time. Title IX also is credited with decreasing dropout rates for women and increasing the number of women in higher education. Allowing trans-identifying biological males to compete in women’s sports, or for women’s scholarships, reverses this progress. Thomas’ drubbing of female swimmers in the Ivy League is just the latest example. The female athlete who would have placed first ended up placing second—to Thomas, a biological male with a proven biological advantage. What’s more, Thomas’ personal bests in the 500 and 1650 freestyle would break current NCAA records in women’s swimming set by an Olympic gold medalist, Katie Ledecky. Imagine if Thomas had competed against Ledecky and performed at a personal-best level. The world might never have come to know of Ledecky. Now imagine how many women athletes would miss out on scholarship and career opportunities if forced to compete against biological males in every contest. This is the world the White House seeks to usher in. Being out of step with reality is bad enough. But the Biden administration is out of step with Americans, too. Polling shows that 67% of Americans oppose allowing biological males who identify as transgender to compete in girls and women’s athletics. Twenty states are suing the Department of Education over the new regulations. Over 37 states have introduced bills to keep women’s sports for women. Nine have passed such bills. The Biden administration and its gender-activist allies made their unpopular view clear from Day One. The administration won’t be content to stop at changing Title IX regulations. It will go on to rewrite the law to force female athletes across the nation to compete against biological males. Barring that, the White House will seek to change the law piece by piece. It will be the death of women’s sports by a thousand cuts. Enough is enough. As we prepare to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Title IX next year, elected officials should stand up for women, for reality, and for the American public. This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal https://women-uniting.co.uk/respectmysex/ Respect My Sex! Local elections are happening on 5th May. Tell candidates: Respect My Sex If You Want My ‘X’! In corporations and councils, from parliament to playgrounds, the two sexes – man and woman, male and female – are being sidelined in language, law, policy and public spaces. Biological sex is a fact of life. It is simple and straightforward, and central to how we organise our world. But now the concept of sex is being undermined. Instead we are offered the idea of ‘gender identity’ – an ‘internal sense of self’ that each of us can define for ourselves. Replacing sex with self-declared gender identity in law and policy is often called ‘gender self-identification’. We are lucky to live in a free society that values self-expression and self-exploration. Everyone, young or old, is free to experiment with their sense of self: how they want to live, dress and express themselves. And nowadays, the sorts of restrictions that used to keep women out of public life, or relegate them to second-class status when it came to family law, finances, employment and so on, are thankfully over. But for some things, sex still matters. It’s not possible to organise sports, or shared spaces like changing rooms and toilets – or to gather meaningful data – based on self-identification. Clarity about sex matters for single-sex spaces. These are essential to both sexes for dignity and privacy, and to women for safety as well. Everyone has a right to privacy about their bodies, especially when undressing or vulnerable. But self-identification means it is becoming impossible to exclude people of one sex from a space that is supposed to be reserved for the other. It means that male people who say that they are women are being allowed into spaces that are supposed to be female-only. Clarity about sex matters for sport. Girls and women need single-sex competitions, because that’s the only way to guarantee safe and fair participation. We deserve to be celebrated when we reach the peak of sporting achievement – just as men are. But self-identification means letting boys compete against girls, and men against women, which in most sports is not fair, and in some is not safe. Clarity about sex matters for safeguarding children. And yet children are being taught that what makes a child a boy or girl isn’t which of the two body types they have, but whether they fit best into masculine or feminine stereotypes. This sexist nonsense is bad for all children, but especially the most vulnerable ones, who can get confused about who they are. Local elections are due on 5th May 2022. And local authorities are also adopting policies that deny the importance of sex. They are ignoring science and undermining language. They are spending thousands of pounds on training that misrepresents the law. In schools, single-sex facilities such as toilets and changing rooms are being replaced with ‘gender-neutral’ ones – which means mixed-sex. Boys who identify as girls are being allowed into girls’ sporting competitions. In public libraries, adult material such as ‘drag queen story time’ is being presented to children. In municipal sports facilities, women’s changing rooms are being opened up to members of the opposite sex on the basis of self-identification. From now, until the 5th May, we need to send politicians a message. We will tell political parties, and the candidates and campaigners who knock on our doors, that sex matters. Women matter. Single-sex spaces matter. Female-only sporting events matter. Child safeguarding matters. Take Action Browse and sign up to one (or more!) of the political women’s groups that make up Women Uniting HERE. Download and print our: DOORSTEP QUESTIONS by the door for when canvassers come calling. WINDOW POSTER, and display it, if you can safely. A4 Flyer: FULL-COLOUR or PRINT FRIENDLY. Write to your local candidates, with our INSPIRATION EMAIL TEXT. Email your regional/ local newspaper with our LETTER TO THE EDITOR, suggesting they feature local candidates in a ‘RespectMySex’ feature. If your candidates reply in support, celebrate that on social media, using the hashtags #RespectMySex #LocalElections2022 #[YourTown] Share your doorstep stories on social media with the hashtag #RespectMySex Download our banner and profile pics for your social media accounts: Sent from my