Early genus homo females would have had the intelligence to discover that heterosexual intercourse made them pregnant. But there is no reason that discovery would lead to selection against the heterosexual instinct genotype or for homosexual genotype ( as asserted below ) . There’s no reason that would cause any individuals with very rare mutations for homosexual genotype to start having heterosex; so the very few existing homosexual genotypes would be selected against relative to heterosexual genotypes in every generation . An individual with heterosexual genotype would likely have more heterosexual matings than homosexual or bisexual genotypes, and be selected for relative to them . Heterosexual instinct would be selected for not against ( obviously !) . It wouldn’t go away !
The notion that heterosexual intercourse would only be preserved non-instinctively because of “higher intelligence “ people wanting children to take care of them in old age is not sound . Stone Age societies were highly mobile ; younger people were not carrying the old with them on their constant movements. This is one reason for shorter life expectancy. There wasn’t much old age .
But even with the rise of cities , beginning circa 6,000 years ago , and some increase in older people , care in old age by children, did not replace heterosexual instinct ; nor , importantly in this argument, would it cause heterosexual instinct / genotype to be selected against , as heterosexual instinct would still be motivating people to have fertile intercourse and pass on heterosexual instinct genes ! Whereas any genetic mutations for non-heterosexual instinct would have fewer fertile matings than instinctive heterosexuals and be selected against in every generation !
The species wide human population has grown since the beginning ( the Darwinian measure of species fitness ) relative to other mammals and primates , expanding out of Africa and around the globe because of human species’ overwhelmingly predominant heterosexual instinct, as in all fit sexually reproducing species. Any sexually reproducing species that somehow loses heterosexual instinct will lose population and become unfit / go extinct. Human population has been expanding since the beginning because it has heterosexual instinct _reinforced_ by cultural principles - high intelligence! - culture which only humans have . Humans have even more heterosexual inclination than non-human species. That’s why the human species population has expanded much greater than other primates , mammals, vertebrates
On Apr 26, 2021, Maure Briggs wrote "Yep, trans-ideology supports and reinforces gender stereotypes... totally conservative and right wing ! "
CB: It is also male supremcist , sociopathic
Maure Briggs www.facebook.com/maureen.cbriggsc www.flickr.com/photos/7279921@N03/page3/ www.pinterest.com/maureclaire/ https://www.goodreads.com/review/list/8476178?shelf=read
-----Original Message----- From: Charles Brown
[lbo-talk] Marx as Essentialist; contra Foucault; Trans ideology is rightwing Charles Brown cb31450 at gmail.com Mon May 23 12:45:38 PDT 2016 Previous message: [lbo-talk] A Skeptical look at capital-S Skepticism -- GREAT speech (John Horgan - Scientific American) Next message: [lbo-talk] Jack Shalom, dialectical mMagician, at the Left Forum (don't miss this video!) Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Search LBO-Talk Archives Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author Sort by: Reverse Sort You are a slanderer ,lying that I'm a bigot or this critique of rightwing , male supremacist ideology . Bruce Jenner is a rightwinger and male supremacist , and you're a pig for supporting him. > > > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: "Lenin's Tomb"
>>> On Apr 13, 2016, >>> >>> Dear All: >>> >>>> . . .Marx : " for the secret of this approach has its unambiguous, decisive, plain and undisguised expression in the relation of man to woman and in the manner in which the direct and natural species-relationship is conceived. The direct, natural, and necessary relation of person to person is the relation of man to woman. "
>>> >>> Some trans ideologist : "Philosophy, poetry and (you forgot to add Charles) transphobic nonsense (except to the new breed of toilet monitors who are emerging below the Mason-Dixon line). >>> >>>> . . . humanity is essentially non-essential." >>> >>> Buddhist thinkers arrived at the same conclusion a few hundred years prior. Correct then; correct now. " >>> CB : Buddhists are not scientists -materialists ; they’re philosophical idealists.
>>>>CB : So, Foucault took license to erase the scientific fact of heterosexual instinct from anthropology and the philosophy of human nature. Foul deed ! Anti-Marxist big lie ! >>> >>> This article from the Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association “explains” about the lack of sexual instinct. The author does note that "the instinct requiring the largest compensating intelligence level before it can be lost is the sexual instinct." I hope other list members will join me in wishing Charles swift attainment of just such a compensating intelligence level. CB : You and the Gay and Lesbian Homosexual) Medical Journal are ignoramuses on biological anthropology . There was no end to human heterosexual instinct . You all are engaged in self-serving pseudoscience. >>> http://www.humansexualevolution.com/index.htm >>> >>> Brian http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2021/05/culturally-inherited-adaptations-give.html
No comments:
Post a Comment