Sunday, May 25, 2014

BLAST FROM THE PAST : BAILOUT DETROIT

In this article from 2011 , I gave my opinion on bailing out Detroit: 


Occupy the  Wall
Street

dictator before he occupies you

 
Published
• Sun, Dec 11, 2011

 
By Charlie Brown




 
Emergency managers have already replaced the people�s elected
officials in majority Black cities around the state and in the Detroit
Public Schools and made draconian austerity cuts to public workers and
public health, welfare and safety services. 


This puts Detroit between a
rock and a hard place, forcing the mayor and city council to consider
harmful cuts, but less than what a financial
dictator would make.

 
Mayor Dave Bing is pushing for privatization of services and asking
the city�s public unions to take a 10 percent cut in wages that
non-union employees took a couple of years ago. The mayor is also
seeking medical benefit and pension cuts.

 
Some on the council, worried the mounting debt will enable Michigan
Republican Gov. Rick Snyder to appoint an emergency manager, talk of
even greater sacrifices: laying off 2,300 public workers, closing
recreational centers and eliminating subsidies to city museums, the
health department and the Detroit Zoo. Last week, the mayor
volunteered himself to be the emergency manager, but that proposal was
opposed by all.

 
Gov. Rick Snyder and the Republican-dominated legislature, to give
more powers to the financial
dictator than the old law provided,
changed the law regarding the appointment of emergency managers. An EM
will now usurp the powers of democratically elected officials in order
to give priority to financial and
Wall Streetinterests over the
interests of city workers and citizens� city services.
If an emergency manager is appointed for Detroit, it will result in
mass firings and harsh wage and benefit reductions for Detroit city
workers. City worker jobs, government jobs, public jobs are real jobs.
Losing jobs will add to the city�s deficit because of lost taxes from
income and property. It will, of course, put more Detroiters into dire
economic straights.
The appointment of an emergency manager to solve the city�s economic
crisis would be profoundly un-American and undemocratic. It would be a
violation of Detroit residents� right to self-determination.
Who is to blame for this crisis?
Detroit�s financial crisis is rooted in the problems of the city�s
automobile-dependent economy. While the auto industry is making a
small comeback, it will never be what it was. Hundreds of thousands of
good paying auto jobs and the tax base they provided were lost, never
to be seen again.
We live in a private enterprise system. This means private business
leaders, not public officials, make the decisions that determine the
ups and downs of our economy. The tea party and Republican story
(pushed 30 years ago by former President Reagan) that �government is
big and bad, and free enterprise is lean and mean,� has been exposed
in the last several years as a big lie put forward by the system,
threatening bankruptcies of the private sector�s largest corporations
and financial institutions.
Where should the money come from to fix Detroit�s deficit? The federal
government � and I say that without any hesitation. If
Wall
Street
could be bailed out to the tune of $11 trillion (as once reported by
the Financial Times; the amount is probably more than that by now),
Detroit can be bailed out for $300 million or $400 million or more.
Wall
Street banks were more broke than Detroit and they were bailed
out by the mythically inefficient public sector, �Big Gov�ment.� Some
of that federal money (that they gave the
Wall
Street banks) is our
tax money, money from the people of Detroit.
Importantly, it is not Detroit officials� corruption or incompetence
that has led to the fiscal crisis, but the economic and financial
incompetence and greed of banks and corporations. Whatever faults they
have, these local public officials, largely African American men and
women, are no worse than the dozens of white men whoexclusively ran
Detroit city government for so many decades.
Detroit�s deficit is also due to the decisions by the private sector
to move so much of the former robust Detroit business sector out of
the city over the last 50 years. This is another way that the private
sector is responsible for Detroit�s plight. As I said, this is a
private enterprise system and Detroit public officials have
essentially no power over this major trend. They have no authority to
start city-owned enterprises that might substitute for the runaway
plants, shops and businesses.
This city�s financial problems are not fundamentally due to city
officials� bad decisions, but to the disinvestment from and failures
of corporate America in Detroit. The last thing the city needs is a
�CEO-thinking� emergency manager. It was CEO thinking that bankrupted
Wall
Street, General Motors and Chrysler.
Given the revenue streams that go straight to
Wall
Street from
Detroit, it is not far off to characterize any emergency manager as a
Wall
Street financial
dictator.
I say, �Occupy�
Wall
Street financial
dictators



Listen to:

WCHB-AM: NewsTalk 1200

 http://blackplanet.songza.com/listen/wchb-am-newstalk-1200-radioone/?omcamp=LSAP_Detroit_wchbnewsdetroit.com

Snyder's proposal first talked about saving our art and pensions... how did all but 2 Detroit house Democrats end up voting for a scheme to give our entire city to Snyder for years? is this the Twilight's Zone? thank you David E. Nathan and Rose Mary Robinson for defending Democracy in Detroit. KILL THE BILL IN THE SENATE.. CALL SENATORS SMITH HOOD, JOHNSON, HUNTER, AND YOUNG TODAY VOTE NO TO LONG-TERM STATE OVER-SIGHT!


Thursday, May 22, 2014

The Minimum Wage is a Gender Issue, Fellas

 Recently, I have reported on McDonald's 99%'ers protesting their low pay.  This Mothers' Month at Labor Power Blog, we ask "are women a larger part of low income Americans than men ?"  Are women a disproportionate fraction of low income and minimum wage workers?
Probably based on the following analysis:


http://poverty.ucdavis.edu/faq/how-does-gender-relate-poverty-status

How does gender relate to poverty status?

Image of How does gender relate to poverty status?
 
In 2012, the poverty rates by gender were
  • 13.6% for males 
  • 16.3% for females
 
 
The gender distribution of people in poverty was
  • 44% of people in poverty were males; males accounted for 49% of the total population
  • 56% of people in poverty were females; females accounted for 51% of the total population
Source: DeNavas-Walt, Carmen, Bernadette D. Proctor, and Jessica C. Smith, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2012 U.S. Census Bureau. Current Population Reports P60-245, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2013. Table 3: People and Families in Poverty by Selected Characteristics: 2011 and 2012 (PDF) Accessed 9/20/2013

 The next article implies the importance of raising the minimum wage to fight female poverty and the gender wage gap.

Why the minimum wage is a gender issue 

http://theweek.com/article/index/245225/why-the-minimum-wage-is-a-gender-issue


Well organized 99%'ers arrested protesting McDonald's low pay

 By Charlie Brown

More than 100 well organized McDonald's workers and their activist supporters were arrested protesting low pay at the company's headquarters yesterday.

                                                               
                                           Detroit's Rev. Charles Williams II, protesting McDonald's low pay at their headquarters yesterday

 This demonstration at McDonald's headquarters is part of a months long coordinated campaign planned by Service Employees International Union.  The protest at McDonald's headquarters on Wednesday was a continuation of a one day strike demonstration last Thursday in 150 cities and 30 countries around the world.
                                             
                                                             

Print monopoly media coverage of the events has portrayed the protestors favorably.

Chicago Tribune's Jessica Wohl reports:
"The push to raise fast-food and retail employees' wages has led to protests nationwide since the movement took shape in 2012, with demonstrations from New York to Los Angeles that are organized by groups financially backed by the Service Employees International Union. Wednesday's gathering marked the latest against McDonald's, coming a day before the company's annual meeting. "

Wohl also says, " The demonstration was peaceful, with 138 protesters presenting their IDs to police and allowing themselves to be arrested and led to a bus, one-by-one, on a hot afternoon. The Oak Brook Police Department said the arrests were made for 'criminal trespass to property' and that those arrested could face a fine."
 http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-mcdonalds-protests-20140521,0,5545443.story

"As in years past, McDonald's marketing to tactics to children was also brought up by speakers. One mother from Lexington, Kentucky, Casey Hinds, said Ronald McDonald was "the Joe Camel of fast food."
Thompson said McDonald's wasn't predatory and that Ronald McDonald was about letting kids have fun. He noted that his children ate the chain's food and turned out "quite healthy," with his daughter even becoming a track star."



 Labor Power Blog reported on the past week's struggles here:

LOW PAY IS NOT OK !http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2014/05/i-support-striking-fast-food-workers.html



"We can't pay our bills. We can't pay our rent. We must be a part of the 99%"http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2014/05/usa-today-as-many-as-2000-protesters.html

 

"Change from the Bottom Up :Minimum Wage Hike Petition in Michigan" http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2014/05/change-from-bottom-up-minimum.html

The protests against low pay in the fast food and retail sales industries are noteworthy for their high level of organization and sophisticated public relations and media strategy.  The nationally and internationally coordinated protest demonstrations have been going since 2012, and the media coverage of them is quite sympathetic compared to the norm. USA Today announced the demonstration the day before it happened. The Chicago Tribune article quoted here is very portrays the McDonald's workers in a positive light.



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-05-21/mcdonald-s-tells-employees-to-stay-home-as-protests-loom.html


                                                 

                                                                   Debs agitating


 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald%27s


"The McDonald's Corporation is the world's largest chain of hamburger fast food restaurants, serving around 68 million customers daily in 119 countries across 35,000 outlets.[4][5] Headquartered in the United States, the company began in 1940 as a barbecue restaurant operated by Richard and Maurice McDonald; in 1948 they reorganized their business as a hamburger stand using production line principles. Businessman Ray Kroc joined the company as a franchise agent in 1955. He subsequently purchased the chain from the McDonald brothers and oversaw its worldwide growth.[6]
A McDonald's restaurant is operated by either a franchisee, an affiliate, or the corporation itself. McDonald's Corporation revenues come from the rent, royalties, and fees paid by the franchisees, as well as sales in company-operated restaurants. In 2012, McDonald's Corporation had annual revenues of $27.5 billion, and profits of $5.5 billion.[7]
McDonald's primarily sells hamburgers, cheeseburgers, chicken, french fries, breakfast items, soft drinks, milkshakes, and desserts. In response to changing consumer tastes, the company has expanded its menu to include salads, fish, wraps, smoothies, fruit,[8][9] and seasoned fries.[10"


https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=873288469353826&set=a.130389670310380.23487.100000180426583&type=1&theater

                                                                 



Wednesday, May 21, 2014

USA Today: As many as 2,000 protesters will gather outside of McDonald's headquarters

USA Today reports:

"On Wednesday, as many as 2,000 protesters from across the country will gather outside of McDonald's headquarters in Oak Brook, Ill., to call for worker wages of $15 an hour and the right to form a union without retaliation....
 A McDonald's worker with six children who says that she's been on food stamps for the 10 years that she's worked at McDonald's, says she's taking a bus to Chicago with other protesters from Kansas City, Mo. "They're making billions ... but we sweep their floors; take out their trash and service their customers," says Melinda Topel, 43, who typically works at the drive-thru cash register. "We don't deserve to live in poverty and to worry about our lights being cut off....One PR consultant suggests that CEO Thompson won't be able to ignore the wage issue."
 http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/05/20/mcdonalds-protesters-annual-meeting-better-wages/9325391/


                                                                 (Photo: EMMANUEL DUNAND, AFP/Getty Images)

Last week, Labor Power Blog reported on a one of the dozens of demonstrations across the world demanding a raise to $15.00 per hour and union representation.

"We can't pay our bills. We can't pay our rent. We must be a part of the 99%"

http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2014/05/we-cant-pay-our-bills-we-cant-pay-our.html

The protest and struggle continues to the point of being reported by the major national daily newspaper, USA Today

The movement for $15.00 per hour is part of the larger current effort  to raise the minimum wage as reported on by Labor Power here :

"Change from the Bottom Up :Minimum Wage Hike Petition in Michigan"

http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2014/05/change-from-bottom-up-minimum.html
                                                       


                                   FOLLOW UP , EXTRA, EXTRA, READ ALL ABOUT IT !
Dear MoveOn member,

McDonald's workers were just arrested outside of corporate headquarters for demanding decent wages and a voice on the job.

One of these workers is Adriana Alvarez, a McDonald's employee who's being paid $9.15 per hour. A mother of a two year-old-son, she's fighting for $15 an hour so she can raise her family.

She was just arrested outside of McDonald's corporate headquarters in Oak Brook, IL, where hundreds of workers are protesting their poverty wages and working conditions on the day before the company's annual shareholder meeting.

She needs our help. Can you call McDonald's right now and tell them you stand with Adriana and the other workers?

Here's the number to call: (855) 572-9499

You will then be connected to one of McDonald's offices around the country. Tell them: "I stand with the arrested workers calling for $15 an hour and the right to form a union without fear of retaliation."

Then, please report your call so that we can track McDonald's response by clicking here: http://pol.moveon.org/call?cp_id=2087&tg=925.

This is not attention that McDonald's executives want. In fact, the company's last annual report acknowledged that worker strikes and their support from the public are pressuring them to raise wages.1 As McDonald's corporate brass heads into tomorrow's shareholder meeting, we can rattle them by flooding their offices with thousands of calls today—putting them on notice and under the glare of a bright spotlight as they discuss McDonald's future.
Adriana isn't the only one counting on us. Her McDonald's coworkers were also arrested for their brave act of civil disobedience. They were standing up for themselves, the families counting on them to be breadwinners, and pretty much every fast food worker everywhere.

Please show your support for these courageous workers by calling McDonald's offices right now: (855) 572-9499.

Tell them that you support these workers. Tell them that it's shameful that people who work for a living have to be arrested in order to be heard. Tell them that it's time for a $15-an-hour wage and the right to form a union without retaliation.

If you get a voicemail prompt when you call, it's because thousands of other people are also calling and McDonald's is being overwhelmed by support for the workers. Leaving a voice message is helpful too!

Just to be extra clear: the workers already risked their livelihoods by going on strike last week in the biggest fast food action in history.2 With the McDonald's shareholder meeting starting in less than 24 hours, we have to make sure they hear us. No one who works for a living should be forced to live in poverty. No one who works for a corporation that makes more than $5 billion in profit annually should have hungry kids at home.3

Your turn. Can you pick up the phone and call McDonald's right now?

Here's where to call:

McDonald's Offices
Phone: (855) 572-9499

Then, please report your call by clicking here:

http://pol.moveon.org/call?cp_id=2087&tg=925&id=96030-19054604-7XIvDJx&t=2

Thanks for all you do.

–Victoria, Nick, Manny, Corinne, and the rest of the team

P.S. For a video series about Adriana and her fight for $15 an hour, check this out: http://fastfoodglobal.org/main/adrianas-fight-for-15/.

Sources:

1. "McDonald's to SEC: Strikes hurt, and we might have to hike pay," Salon, March 4, 2014
http://www.moveon.org/r/?r=298377&id=96030-19054604-7XIvDJx&t=3

2. "It's On: The Biggest Fast Food Strike in World History Has Started," Vice, May 15, 2014
http://www.moveon.org/r/?r=298369&id=96030-19054604-7XIvDJx&t=4

3. "McDonald's Corp," CNN Money, accessed May 21, 2013
http://www.moveon.org/r/?r=298371&id=96030-19054604-7XIvDJx&t=5

Want to support our work? We're entirely funded by our 8 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures

                        

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

Our Mother Nature: Antoinette Blackwell


Blackwell chose to highlight balance and cooperation rather than
struggle and savage rivalry.

By Charlie Brown

Antoinette Blackwell was both an Evolutionist and a Creationist ! She
was the first woman ordained as a Christian minister in the US , and
she wrote a General Science textbook agreeing with Charles Darwin's
theory of the evolution of species by natural selection. What an
interesting historical character in light of today's debates between
Creationists and Evolutionists !

Mother Blackwell was also a suffragette. In 1920, at age 95, she was
the only participant of the 1850 Women's Rights Convention in
Worcester, Massachusetts who lived long enough to vote when at last
women had the vote, dammit.

Reverend Blackwell was also an abolitionist against slavery. She was
one of the few white feminists to support the 15th Amendment giving
the vote to Black men, even as no women had the vote. She supported
the famous African American leader, Frederick Douglass, in this debate
within American feminism in the mid-1900's.

A regular Force of Nature was she.


I came across Blackwell in reading about Charles Darwin's book  The
Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex.  Antoinette
Blackwell wrote The Sexes Throughout Nature.  I haven't actually read
those books yet, but I have them on order. Future blogs will explore
the issues in those books more.

Meanwhile, Wikipedia's items explains how Blackwell argued that there
was natural selection for "cooperation and balance" among humans, all
of us members of the same species.  Survival of the fittest does not
mean survival of competition between humans, survival of the toughest
individual "men".  The fittest are those who successfully reproduce !
Reproduction requires , in the first place, cooperation (smiles).

On the primacy of cooperation in natural origins , See Labor Power's

Is Human Nature Social or Selfish ?

blog http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2014/05/is-human-nature-social-or-selfish-i.html


  Antoinette Blackwell's book, The Sexes Throughout Nature,  critiques
Charles Darwin four years after he published The Descent of Man, and
Selection in Relation to Sex in 1871,[1] and Herbert Spencer, whom the
author thought were the most influential men of her day.[2] Darwin had
written a letter to her in 1869, thanking her for a copy of her book,
Studies in General Science.[3] She also answers Dr. E. H. Clarke and
his book Sex and Education which she deplored.[4] Blackwell's book was
republished by Hyperion Press in 1976, 1985 and 1992.[5] Parts of the
book were first published in Woman's Journal and Popular Science
Monthly.[6]
Blackwell chose to highlight balance and cooperation rather than
struggle and savage rivalry. She criticized Darwin for basing his
theory of evolution on "time-honored assumption that the male is the
normal type of his species".[7] She wrote that Spencer scientifically
subtracts from the female and Darwin as scientifically adds to the
male.[6]

Darwin's theories of evolution by natural selection were used to show
women's place in society was the result of nature.[14] One of the
first women to critique Darwin, Antoinette Brown Blackwell published
The Sexes Throughout Nature in 1875.[15] She was aware she would be
considered presumptuous for criticising evolutionary theory but wrote
that "disadvantages under which we [women] are placed...will never be
lessened by waiting".[16] Blackwell's book answered Darwin and Herbert
Spencer, who she thought were the two most influential living men.[17]
She wrote of "defrauded womanhood" and her fears that "the human race,
forever retarding its own advancement...could not recognize and
promote a genuine, broad, and healthful equilibrium of the sexes".[18]


  It was not until one century later[8] that feminists were working
from inside the natural sciences, and could address Darwin's
androcentricity.[1]
Sarah Blaffer Hrdy wrote in her book Mother Nature: A History of
Mothers, Infants and Natural Selection (quoting from an excerpt of
pages 12–25 in AnthroNotes for educators published by the National
Museum of Natural History),

"For a handful of nineteenth-century women intellectuals, however,
evolutionary theory was just too important to ignore. Instead of
turning away, they stepped forward to tap Darwin and Spencer on the
shoulder to express their support for this revolutionary view of human
nature, and also to politely remind them that they had left out half
the species."[9]

Hrdy added, "Evolutionary biology did eventually respond to these
criticisms, yet in their lifetimes, the effect that these early
Darwinian feminists—Eliot, Blackwell, Royer, and a few others—had on
mainstream evolutionary theory can be summed up with one phrase: the
road not taken."[10]


In the Descent of Man, Darwin wrote that by choosing tools and weapons
over the years, "man has ultimately become superior to woman"[19] but
Blackwell's argument for women's equality went largely ignored until
the 1970s when feminist scientists and historians began to explore
Darwin.[20] As recently as 2004, Griet Vandermassen, aligned with
other Darwinian feminists of the 1990s and early 2000s (decade), wrote
that a unifying theory of human nature should include sexual
selection.[15] But then the "opposite ongoing integration" was
promoted by another faction as an alternative in 2007.[21]
Nonetheless, Darwin's explanation of sexual selection continues to
receive support from both social and biological scientists as "the
best explanation to date".[22]v

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sexes_Throughout_Nature

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Descent_of_Man,_and_Selection_in_Relation_to_Sex#Part_II_and_III:_Sexual_selection

Perhaps Antoinette Blackwell's ideas are a basis for cooperation between Creationists and Evolutionists today !




Subsequent related articles: 

America dumbs down

The U.S. is being overrun by a wave of anti-science, anti-intellectual thinking. Has the most powerful nation on Earth lost its mind?
"South Carolina’s state beverage is milk. Its insect is the praying mantis. There’s a designated dance—the shag—as well a sanctioned tartan, game bird, dog, flower, gem and snack food (boiled peanuts). But what Olivia McConnell noticed was missing from among her home’s 50 official symbols was a fossil. So last year, the eight-year-old science enthusiast wrote to the governor and her representatives to nominate the Columbian mammoth. Teeth from the woolly proboscidean, dug up by slaves on a local plantation in 1725, were among the first remains of an ancient species ever discovered in North America. Forty-three other states had already laid claim to various dinosaurs, trilobites, primitive whales and even petrified wood. It seemed like a no-brainer. “Fossils tell us about our past,” the Grade 2 student wrote.

And, as it turns out, the present, too. The bill that Olivia inspired has become the subject of considerable angst at the legislature in the state capital of Columbia. First, an objecting state senator attached three verses from Genesis to the act, outlining God’s creation of all living creatures. Then, after other lawmakers spiked the amendment as out of order for its introduction of the divinity, he took another crack, specifying that the Columbian mammoth “was created on the sixth day with the other beasts of the field.” That version passed in the senate in early April. But now the bill is back in committee as the lower house squabbles over the new language, and it’s seemingly destined for the same fate as its honouree—extinction." http://www.macleans.ca/politics/america-dumbs-down/

Republicans are taking their science denialism to striking new levels.
AlterNet 
 http://www.alternet.org/belief/how-right-wingers-are-amping-their-war-science-and-reality

Sunday, May 18, 2014

LABOR MOTHERS: FLORENCE REECE

Which side are you on in the struggle between the 99% and the 1%, the bourgeoisie ?

Labor Power Blog is extending Mothers' Week to Mothers' Month. Today we remember  :

Florence Reece 

  http://peoplesworld.org/today-in-labor-history-remembering-florence-reece/


Which Side Are You On Florence Reece Original

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nzudto-FA5Y&feature=kp

 http://unionsong.com/u015.html



Which Side Are You On?


A Song by Florence Patton Reece
Come all of you good workers
Good news to you I'll tell
Of how that good old union
Has come in here to dwell
Chorus
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
My daddy was a miner
And I'm a miner's son
And I'll stick with the union
Till every battle's won
They say in Harlan County
There are no neutrals there
You'll either be a union man
Or a thug for J.H. Blair
Oh, workers can you stand it?
Oh, tell me how you can
Will you be a lousy scab
Or will you be a man?
Don't scab for the bosses
Don't listen to their lies
Us poor folks haven't got a chance
Unless we organize
French Translation (Gwénaël Forestier)
Venez vous tous, les bons ouvriers
j'ai de bonnes nouvelles à vous dire!
Comment va ce bonne vieux syndicat?
Je te dirais qu'il est là pour durer!
Choeur
De lequel le côté es tu?
De lequel le côté es tu?
De lequel le côté es tu?
De lequel le côté es tu?

Mon papa était un mineur
Et je suis le fils d'un mineur
Je resterai fidèle au syndicat
Jusqu'à ce que chaque bataille soit gagnée
Ils disent dans le Comté de Harlan
Qu'il n'y a personne de neutre ici
Vous, êtes vous un syndicaliste?
Ou, vous êtes, un voyou de la bande à J.H. Blair?
Oh, comment les ouvriers peuvent-ils vous supporter?
Oh, dites-moi comment vous le pouvez?
Êtes vous une vieille croûte?
Ou serez-vous des hommes?
Ne faites pas de boulot pour les patrons
N'écoutez pas leurs mensonges
Nous les pauvres gens, nous n'aurons aucune chance
Sans que nous nous organisions

Notes

Pete Seeger in an introduction to "Which Side Are You On?" on his record "Cant You See This System's Rotten Through And Through" says: "Maybe the most famous song it was ever my privilege to know was the one written by Mrs Florence Reece. Her husband Sam was an organiser in that "bloody" strike in Harlan County, Kentucky in 1932.
They got word that the company gun-thugs were out to kill him, and he got out of his house, I think out the back door, just before they arrived. And Mrs Reece said they stuck their guns into the closets, into the beds, even into the piles of dirty linen. One of her two little girls started crying and one of the men said "What are you crying for? We're not after you we're after your old man"
After they had gone she felt so outraged she tore a calendar off the wall and on the back of it wrote the words and put them to the tune of an old hard-shelled Baptist hymn tune, although come to think of it the hymn tune used an old English ballad melody ... And her two little girls used to go singing it in the union halls."
Many thanks to Gwénaël Forestier for the French translation





Billy Bragg - Which Side Are You On


"Florence Reece (née Patton; born April 12, 1900, died August 3, 1986) was an American social activist, poet, and folksong writer. Born in Sharps Chapel, Tennessee, the daughter and wife of coal miners, she is best known for the song, "Which Side Are You On?" which, according to folklorist Alan Lomax who collected it from her in 1937, she wrote at age 12 when her father was out on strike. In 1931, during the Harlan County War strike by the United Mine Workers of America and the National Miners Union in which her husband, Sam Reece, was an organizer.[1] She wrote it out on a calendar, possibly updating it, and that's the version known today.
Pete Seeger, collecting labor union songs, learned "Which Side Are You On" in 1940. The following year, it was recorded by the Almanac Singers in a version that gained a wide audience. More recently, Billy Bragg, Dropkick Murphys, Natalie Merchant, and Ani DiFranco each recorded their own interpretations of the song, DiFranco's being a complete rewrite.
Alan Lomax, writing in the American Folk Song Book (1968), says "Florence Reece, a shy, towheaded Kentucky miner's daughter, composed this song at the age of 12 when her father was out on strike. She sang it me standing in front of the primitive hearth of a log cabin in the backwoods of Kentucky in 1937 and it has since become a national union song. The tune is an American variant of the English Jack Munro, "which side are you on" having been substituted for "lay the lily-o"."[citation needed]
Reece appeared in the Academy Award-winning documentary film, Harlan County, USA, singing her anthem to rally the striking miners.
Florence and Sam Reece were married for 64 years, until his death from pneumoconiosis (black lung) in 1978. After a lifetime of speaking out on behalf of unions and social welfare issues, Florence Reece died of a heart attack in 1986 at the age of 86 in Knoxville, Tennessee.[2]"   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florence_Reece


West Virginia Coal Mine, With More 250 Safety Violations In 2013, Kills Two (VIDEO)/ By Mother Randa Morris


http://take10randa.blogspot.com/2014/05/west-virginia-coal-mine-with-more-250.html


Mining execs among 24 detained by Turkish police


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-turkey-mining-disaster-20140518,0,2134058.story

For the People Owning the Too-Big-To-Fail Corporations


                              



By Charlie Brown

It is important to point out that the Too-big-to-fail banks and corporations
did in fact fail back in 2008; even though they were bailed out.  The demand
the Wall Street rulers made to Washington for a bailout was a confession that 
the whole financial system was insolvent. The USA's, We the People's,  bailout brought
 the finance system back from the dead. Capitalism does not add up.
 After 500 years, it ends up that capitalism is bankrupt and insolvent
by its own generally accepted accounting principles.

The shadowy finance ministers who ordered President Bush to bailout Wall Street,
said that certain financial institutions are "too big to fail".  If they fail they will destroy the
 financial system, and so the federal government must save them in order to
avoid total economic disaster for America and the world.

So, they were given trillions of dollars of what amounted to semi-gifts
( sort of "pay it back if you can at your own pace"; would that we could get
such terms in loans from these same banks)
, and the concept of "too-big-to-fail corporations"
gained wide public awareness.

Although, there was not total collapse , the bank failures that did
 occur triggered the so-called Great Recession.
We, the 99%,  suffered and suffer still enormously from that
recession as it resulted in all around economic distress for
tens of millions of Americans over the last six years.
These failures of the leading private institutions of
our Economy, led to an excruciating economic Depression for the Many.
Large swathes of the middle
and "lower" classes suffer poverty, foreclosure, unemployment, and the
many ways of misery, premature deaths, disease, divorce, crime, etc,
that are generated by economic downturn , especially in a jobless
recovery only for corporate profits and exploitation by the 1%

It is objectively true that this would have been worse for the 99% if
the Too-big-to-fails had not been bailed out. So, it is not the case that
these corporations should not have been bailed out, but that their Creditor,
The People, should get more for their bailout money than they did:
ownership of the big debtors.

To reiterate,_circa_ 2008, with the insolvency of financial institutions designated
Too-big-to-fails by our nation's highest financial ministers ( in other
words straight from the horse's mouth), We, the People, learned of or
were reminded of a category of economic life that had not been so
explicit in the national discourse. These Big Banks were bailed out
and avoided bankruptcy with guarantees or assurances of
anywhere from $16 to 29 trillion by the
United States of America, because the national unelected , financial ministers
declared that their failure would bring down the entire financial
industry of the US and perhaps "the West". In other words, the
insolvency of the Too-Big-To-Fail corporations was in fact the
insolvency of the whole financial system. It was a confession that
capitalism doesn't add up; it fundamentally cannot meet its own
standard of moral hazard. Wall Street's debts exceeded its assets by a
dozen or two trillion dollars, at that historic moment.

Any debtor of Wall Street creditors who reaches such a moment , must
not be bailed out because of the danger of moral hazard. If we apply
Wall Street's own standard to itself, the 2008 bailout represents the
biggest moral hazard in history, pretty much. So, the principle of
moral hazard is dead.

General Motors and Chrysler, two of our largest corporations, though
evidently an order of magnitude smaller than the Wall Street
Too-big-to-fails, were also bailed because they arer too
big to fail without devastating economic impact.
. The bailed out Too-big-to-fails, owned and controlled and
expropriated by the 1%, continue to live in fabulous luxury greater
than any ruling class in history,

There is a long history of government bailout of corporations;
History of U.S. Gov't Bailouts 
http://www.propublica.org/special/government-bailouts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Too_big_to_fail)




The Great Recession caused many states ,including, California and Illinois, actual insolvency ,
though it was not declared; and they were bailed out of deficits by
the Obama Stimulus plan.

What is to be done now so many years from The Financial Big Bang ?

Well, like the Big Bang, it is still affecting us.

We, the People, who bailed out the Economy, must have ownership and
control of all Too-big-to-fail corporations. Private owners , who put
private interests above public interests always, cannot be trusted
with control and distribution of the products of the Economy's
Too-big-to-fail Economic Units, because their failure does not impact
the incomes of the 1% current owners, but only the lives of the masses
of people. The failure of  Too-big-to-fails is dumped on the 99%, and
avoided by the 1% who own them now. The 99% must own them, therefore.

We must reverse the current circumstance in which , essentially, the
Too-big-to-fails own The People, as demonstrated by their ordering the
Presidents and Congress to give them dozens of Trillions of dollars
without their giving up ownership of themselves in exchange as would
occur in any such transaction in the "free" market. The
Too-big-to-fails still owe the People for the
Bailout. We, The Creditors, are coming to Collect.

Enact a .law :requiring the Federal Reserve to report and list quarterly on
all too-big-to-fail corporations, and initiate proceedings to take them
over. Use the same criterion as was used in the bailouts.

Enact a Law: One of the rationales for exploiting interests from debtors,
recipients of loans, is that the creditor puts its money at risk.
Since, the Too-Big-to-Fails will be bailed by the government if too
many of their loans fail, their interest rates should be abated or
negated, because they are not taking the risk they claim.

Reassert federal ownership of General Motors and Chrysler. Chrysler has been bailed out twice by the federal government.
 Take Federal ownership of JP Morgan, Citibank, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, AIG and
all Wall Street, Too-big-to-fails. before they fail again.

                                                                             








The Whole Economy Is Rife with Ponzi Schemes

Many ordinary business practices resemble the infamous con game









                                                             
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-whole-economy-is-rife-with-ponzi-schemes/?&WT.mc_id=SA_WR_20140528






Which side are you on in the struggle between the 99% and the 1% ?

Which Side Are You On Florence Reece Original

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nzudto-FA5Y&feature=kp


http://peoplesworld.org/today-in-labor-history-remembering-florence-reece/ 


"Florence Reece (née Patton; born April 12, 1900, died August 3, 1986) was an American social activist, poet, and folksong writer. Born in Sharps Chapel, Tennessee, the daughter and wife of coal miners, she is best known for the song, "Which Side Are You On?" which, according to folklorist Alan Lomax who collected it from her in 1937, she wrote at age 12 when her father was out on strike. In 1931, during the Harlan County War strike by the United Mine Workers of America and the National Miners Union in which her husband, Sam Reece, was an organizer.[1] She wrote it out on a calendar, possibly updating it, and that's the version known today.
Pete Seeger, collecting labor union songs, learned "Which Side Are You On" in 1940. The following year, it was recorded by the Almanac Singers in a version that gained a wide audience. More recently, Billy Bragg, Dropkick Murphys, Natalie Merchant, and Ani DiFranco each recorded their own interpretations of the song, DiFranco's being a complete rewrite.
Alan Lomax, writing in the American Folk Song Book (1968), says "Florence Reece, a shy, towheaded Kentucky miner's daughter, composed this song at the age of 12 when her father was out on strike. She sang it me standing in front of the primitive hearth of a log cabin in the backwoods of Kentucky in 1937 and it has since become a national union song. The tune is an American variant of the English Jack Munro, "which side are you on" having been substituted for "lay the lily-o"."[citation needed]
Reece appeared in the Academy Award-winning documentary film, Harlan County, USA, singing her anthem to rally the striking miners.
Florence and Sam Reece were married for 64 years, until his death from pneumoconiosis (black lung) in 1978. After a lifetime of speaking out on behalf of unions and social welfare issues, Florence Reece died of a heart attack in 1986 at the age of 86 in Knoxville, Tennessee.[2]"   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florence_Reece

PETE SEEGER - Which Side Are You On? (lyrics included)