US Military Is Out of Missiles - And Iran
Knows It
" 1.1K Hype Points
United States
Something happened in a Senate hearing room in February 2025 that should have broken the internet.
John Phelan, the newly confirmed Navy Secretary, sat in front of the Senate Armed Services Committee and said under oath that the Uni... more
<
https://youtu.be/xAa24csIzY0?si=plg-RP4MmrOhXC8G
http://take10charles.blogspot.com/2026/03/httpsyoutu_8.html<
Something happened in a Senate hearing room in February 2025 that should have broken the internet.<
John Phelan, the newly confirmed Navy Secretary, sat in front of the Senate Armed Services Committee and said under oath that the United States Navy is at a "dangerously low level from a stockpile perspective." Not low. Dangerously low.
And then he confirmed that the Navy doesn't have enough missiles in inventory to fully load its own ships - not even once - across the entire fleet.
That testimony was real. It was public. And almost nobody covered what it actually means.
This video breaks down the full picture - the production timelines, the procurement math, the cost asymmetry between American interceptors and Iranian attack weapons, and why a serving US Navy officer published a comparison in the Navy's own professional journal that should make every taxpayer stop and think.
What this video covers
What this video covers
The exact words the Navy Secretary said under oath and what they reveal about current US missile stockpile levels. How 15 months of near-daily combat operations in the Red Sea burned through interceptor reserves that took decades to build.
Why Raytheon delivered only roughly 500 of the
625 SM-6 missiles it was contracted to build starting in 2019. The verified cost asymmetry - what it costs Iran to launch an attack versus what it costs the US to defend against one. A comparison published in the US Naval Institute's Proceedings journal by a serving Navy officer that reframes the entire defense production debate. Three specific scenarios for how this plays out over the next 24 months, with honest probability assessments. What the February 2026 Raytheon framework deals actually mean for timeline — and what they don't solve.
Why this matters beyond military strategy<
The Bank That Forced America Into WWI - The Hidden History
503
Likes
29,789
Views
Feb 22 2026
» 5.7K Hype Points
#HiddenHistory
#Lusitania
Before Woodrow Wilson asked Congress to declare war on Germany in April 1917, one bank had already made the decision for him. While America publicly preached neutrality, JP Morgan & Co. had quietly become Britain's exclusive purchasing agent, arranged the largest foreign loan in Wall Street history, and built a financial machine so deeply entangled with Allied victory that American intervention wasn't a question of if — it was a question of when.
This is the story of how the House of Morgan financed both sides of the argument: lending billions to Britain and France, directing that money straight back into American factories it helped control, collecting commissions in both directions,catastrophe for Wall Street. By the time the Lusitania sank, the Zimmermann Telegram leaked, and Wilson finally stood before Congress, the machinery had been running for nearly three years.
In 1934, a US Senate committee spent 18 months and 93 hearings trying to prove what many already suspected. What they found was damning - even if it stopped short of the word conspiracy. This video tells the full story, from Jekyll Island to the Liberty Bond drives, from the Anglo-French loan of 1915 to the permanent shift of global financial power from London to New York.
The official history says America entered WWI to make the world safe for democracy. The financial history tells a different story.
#WorldWarOne #JPMorgan #HiddenHistory
#WallStreet #WWI #BankingHistory
#AmericanHistory #NyeCommittee #Lusitania #FederalReserve #Geopolitics #FinancialHistory #HouseOfMorgan #USHistory #PowerAndMoney
https://youtu.be/Koq6IhadPuQ?si=5iL39lZgZpvh-Ei-
No comments:
Post a Comment